<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 20 Languages of the World</title>
	<link>http://pocketcultures.com/topicsoftheworld/2008/06/09/top-20-languages-of-the-world/</link>
	<description>the world in your pocket</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://pocketcultures.com/topicsoftheworld/2008/06/09/top-20-languages-of-the-world/#comment-1383</link>
		<author>Liz</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pocketcultures.com/topicsoftheworld/2008/06/09/top-20-languages-of-the-world/#comment-1383</guid>
		<description>The Turkey number looks low to me as well. This list was written around 10 years ago, and it looks as if the main difference is the Turkish population, which has grown around 10m in that time. 

Of course the place in the rankings depends on how much the others grew as well. This list also differs from other rankings (and this is one of the reasons I found it interesting) in that it tries to count 1st and 2nd language speakers – many other rankings count only 1st language speakers, which I think has less practical relevance. 

I’m not an expert to be able to say whether Azeri counts technically as the same language, even if it is perfectly mutually intelligible with Turkish (well, maybe apart from uçak duşuyor ☺) But you are right that there are at very least a few million speakers outside Turkey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Turkey number looks low to me as well. This list was written around 10 years ago, and it looks as if the main difference is the Turkish population, which has grown around 10m in that time. </p>
<p>Of course the place in the rankings depends on how much the others grew as well. This list also differs from other rankings (and this is one of the reasons I found it interesting) in that it tries to count 1st and 2nd language speakers – many other rankings count only 1st language speakers, which I think has less practical relevance. </p>
<p>I’m not an expert to be able to say whether Azeri counts technically as the same language, even if it is perfectly mutually intelligible with Turkish (well, maybe apart from uçak duşuyor ☺) But you are right that there are at very least a few million speakers outside Turkey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eye_snap</title>
		<link>http://pocketcultures.com/topicsoftheworld/2008/06/09/top-20-languages-of-the-world/#comment-1375</link>
		<author>eye_snap</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 10:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pocketcultures.com/topicsoftheworld/2008/06/09/top-20-languages-of-the-world/#comment-1375</guid>
		<description>In a similar list I had seen before, Turkish was 13th. I dont know how accurate that is but I know for a fact that Turkey has over 70m citizens and even though not all of them may not be speaking Turkish, the numer of Turkish speaking people has to be over 61m. ...Many people in Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan and Georgia speak Turkish too. Oh also , if I am not wrong, some other countries after Yugoslavia's division has Turkish as one of their official languages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a similar list I had seen before, Turkish was 13th. I dont know how accurate that is but I know for a fact that Turkey has over 70m citizens and even though not all of them may not be speaking Turkish, the numer of Turkish speaking people has to be over 61m. &#8230;Many people in Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan and Georgia speak Turkish too. Oh also , if I am not wrong, some other countries after Yugoslavia&#8217;s division has Turkish as one of their official languages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occastitoff</title>
		<link>http://pocketcultures.com/topicsoftheworld/2008/06/09/top-20-languages-of-the-world/#comment-958</link>
		<author>Occastitoff</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pocketcultures.com/topicsoftheworld/2008/06/09/top-20-languages-of-the-world/#comment-958</guid>
		<description>Hi all! 
Nice site! 
 
G'night</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all!<br />
Nice site! </p>
<p>G&#8217;night</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quynh Anh</title>
		<link>http://pocketcultures.com/topicsoftheworld/2008/06/09/top-20-languages-of-the-world/#comment-864</link>
		<author>Quynh Anh</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 07:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pocketcultures.com/topicsoftheworld/2008/06/09/top-20-languages-of-the-world/#comment-864</guid>
		<description>Your post 20 Languages of the World is helpfull to me. Thanks for Sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your post 20 Languages of the World is helpfull to me. Thanks for Sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://pocketcultures.com/topicsoftheworld/2008/06/09/top-20-languages-of-the-world/#comment-400</link>
		<author>Daniel</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 02:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pocketcultures.com/topicsoftheworld/2008/06/09/top-20-languages-of-the-world/#comment-400</guid>
		<description>According to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_languages_by_number_of_native_speakers
Arabic is the 5th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_languages_by_number_of_native_speakers" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_languages_by_number_of_native_speakers</a><br />
Arabic is the 5th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riad</title>
		<link>http://pocketcultures.com/topicsoftheworld/2008/06/09/top-20-languages-of-the-world/#comment-243</link>
		<author>Riad</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pocketcultures.com/topicsoftheworld/2008/06/09/top-20-languages-of-the-world/#comment-243</guid>
		<description>Modern Standard Arabic is understood by people of all dialects and regions. It is true that regional dialects play a huge part in the different ethnicity of Arab nations and regions (i.e. Levantine, Egyptian, etc.) - however, the Arabic that is in the mass media, on television, newspapers, textbooks, school lesson plans, is all universally understood.

No matter where you are in the Arabic world, MSA can be easily understood and picked up regardless of dialect.

(and this is not even mentioning Quranic Arabic, which is not only understood by the 250+ million in the Arab world but nearly universally by the nearly 1 billion Muslims around the world!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modern Standard Arabic is understood by people of all dialects and regions. It is true that regional dialects play a huge part in the different ethnicity of Arab nations and regions (i.e. Levantine, Egyptian, etc.) - however, the Arabic that is in the mass media, on television, newspapers, textbooks, school lesson plans, is all universally understood.</p>
<p>No matter where you are in the Arabic world, MSA can be easily understood and picked up regardless of dialect.</p>
<p>(and this is not even mentioning Quranic Arabic, which is not only understood by the 250+ million in the Arab world but nearly universally by the nearly 1 billion Muslims around the world!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://pocketcultures.com/topicsoftheworld/2008/06/09/top-20-languages-of-the-world/#comment-242</link>
		<author>Liz</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pocketcultures.com/topicsoftheworld/2008/06/09/top-20-languages-of-the-world/#comment-242</guid>
		<description>Hi Haddon.  This list counts people speaking the language either as their first or second language, so they are probably pretty fluent. 

I agree with you that there are probably a lot of people who can use a given language for communication (without being fluent) who aren't counted here, especially in English.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Haddon.  This list counts people speaking the language either as their first or second language, so they are probably pretty fluent. </p>
<p>I agree with you that there are probably a lot of people who can use a given language for communication (without being fluent) who aren&#8217;t counted here, especially in English.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: haddon</title>
		<link>http://pocketcultures.com/topicsoftheworld/2008/06/09/top-20-languages-of-the-world/#comment-240</link>
		<author>haddon</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 12:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pocketcultures.com/topicsoftheworld/2008/06/09/top-20-languages-of-the-world/#comment-240</guid>
		<description>i would like to know what the level of fluency required is to make it on the list. 

for instance, i dont know a whole lot of spanish, but mixing words around (with horrible grammar, i am sure) i can often get my point across. could i have a conversation about aristotle or some sports team in spanish? 

i aslo think the level of english has probably raised quite a bit, with the internet. the majority of sites, games, movies etc are in english, and with china, india, japan, germany, france and im sure many others having english be a near-requirement in many schools and universities, a basic understanding of the language has probably gone up by at least 30% more than just the population growth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would like to know what the level of fluency required is to make it on the list. </p>
<p>for instance, i dont know a whole lot of spanish, but mixing words around (with horrible grammar, i am sure) i can often get my point across. could i have a conversation about aristotle or some sports team in spanish? </p>
<p>i aslo think the level of english has probably raised quite a bit, with the internet. the majority of sites, games, movies etc are in english, and with china, india, japan, germany, france and im sure many others having english be a near-requirement in many schools and universities, a basic understanding of the language has probably gone up by at least 30% more than just the population growth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergio</title>
		<link>http://pocketcultures.com/topicsoftheworld/2008/06/09/top-20-languages-of-the-world/#comment-229</link>
		<author>Sergio</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pocketcultures.com/topicsoftheworld/2008/06/09/top-20-languages-of-the-world/#comment-229</guid>
		<description>WAIT!

there are NO italians in the list!!!!!


AAAAARRRRGGGGGGGGG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WAIT!</p>
<p>there are NO italians in the list!!!!!</p>
<p>AAAAARRRRGGGGGGGGG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Ostler</title>
		<link>http://pocketcultures.com/topicsoftheworld/2008/06/09/top-20-languages-of-the-world/#comment-225</link>
		<author>Nicholas Ostler</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pocketcultures.com/topicsoftheworld/2008/06/09/top-20-languages-of-the-world/#comment-225</guid>
		<description>Thanks for quoting the book. Perhaps it would help if I add a few comments on Arabic and English as they appear (or not) in this list. This was a list of languages listed by the total of their first- and second-language speakers. (Hence the relatively high figures for English, and Hindi.) In principle, therefore, Caribbean dialects of English will be included. Arabic has lost out in the pecking order, since modern standard Arabic, or FusHa, although it straddles all the Arabic dialect areas, is not at the command of most of their speakers. I added as a footnote:

(the largest Arabic dialect)  ... Egyptian Arabic, with 46 million speakers, ... ranks ... no higher than 23rd. The different “dialects” of Arabic, of which there are over 25, offer quite solid barriers to mutual intelligibility, so they are well cast in this list as distinct languages. If they are consolidated as a single hyper-language community, united by the élite’s use of Classical Arabic as a lingua franca, they would amount to something over 205 million, placing them between Bengali and Portuguese.)

In general I gave short shrift to dialect differences in the book, even where they're substantial. Culturally, no doubt, all these Arabic-speakers feel part of the same language community, and those communities were what I was writing about in the narrative sections of the book. So I could have tried to sum the Arab language community. But they are comparable in difference of intelligibility, I would suggest - contra Kase above, not to English but to Chinese dialects - and these are treated as separate languages in this statistical chapter. (My main source of data was the SIL Ethnologue - and SIL are notorious as 'splitters' rather than 'lumpers' in their approach to languages.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for quoting the book. Perhaps it would help if I add a few comments on Arabic and English as they appear (or not) in this list. This was a list of languages listed by the total of their first- and second-language speakers. (Hence the relatively high figures for English, and Hindi.) In principle, therefore, Caribbean dialects of English will be included. Arabic has lost out in the pecking order, since modern standard Arabic, or FusHa, although it straddles all the Arabic dialect areas, is not at the command of most of their speakers. I added as a footnote:</p>
<p>(the largest Arabic dialect)  &#8230; Egyptian Arabic, with 46 million speakers, &#8230; ranks &#8230; no higher than 23rd. The different “dialects” of Arabic, of which there are over 25, offer quite solid barriers to mutual intelligibility, so they are well cast in this list as distinct languages. If they are consolidated as a single hyper-language community, united by the élite’s use of Classical Arabic as a lingua franca, they would amount to something over 205 million, placing them between Bengali and Portuguese.)</p>
<p>In general I gave short shrift to dialect differences in the book, even where they&#8217;re substantial. Culturally, no doubt, all these Arabic-speakers feel part of the same language community, and those communities were what I was writing about in the narrative sections of the book. So I could have tried to sum the Arab language community. But they are comparable in difference of intelligibility, I would suggest - contra Kase above, not to English but to Chinese dialects - and these are treated as separate languages in this statistical chapter. (My main source of data was the SIL Ethnologue - and SIL are notorious as &#8217;splitters&#8217; rather than &#8216;lumpers&#8217; in their approach to languages.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
